Is this correct, or should we be coming up with a mach 3 or better ASM? Many other navies have gone to high supersonic capable AShMs. If you look at Brahmos or similar AShMs – they’re 2 to 3 times the size of subsonic ASh-missiles. LRASM-A is a subsonic cruise missile based on Lockheed Martin's 500 nm-range AGM-158 JASSM-ER; Lockheed Martin was awarded initial development contracts. "Lightning") also known as LR-SAM or as MR-SAM is an Indo-Israeli surface-to-air missile (SAM), designed to defend against any type of airborne threat including aircraft, helicopters, anti-ship missiles, and UAVs as well as ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and combat jets. LRASM-B development was much riskier from a technical point of view, and the harsh nature of high-Mach environments would add extra risk to its manufacturing and test phases, too. That means you can carry at least twice the number of LRASM compared to Brahmos … LRASM will identify high value targets on its own and home in on them.

The big monsters like P-500/P-700 cant fit on any tactical aircraft. Instead of achieving high Mach numbers to make the missile more survivable against air defense threats, the subsonic LRASM uses stealth and autonomous decision-making to evade shipboard defenses. GPS gets you to an area, our LRASM uses it too, not a specific ship. Delete It's always interesting to discuss the pluses/minuses of supersonic vs subsonic AshCMs, but what ability, today, do units of the USN have to defend themselves against Brahmos or the even faster Zircon scheduled to be deployed next year on Admiral Nakhimov? Anti-Radiation MissilesAGM-88G AARGM-ER Gray Wolf YJ-12 ARMAnti-Ship MissilesBrahMos ER BrahMos-2 BrahMos-NG CM-401 FCASW IDAS JSM Land-to-Sea Missile LRASM SLV MANSUP Maritime Strike Tomahawk Marte ER Marte Mk2/S-A Neptun RBS15 Gungnir Sea Venom XASM-3 ER XSSM ZarbCruise Missiles3M51 9M729 AGM-183A ARRW ASN4G AV-TM 300 Babur-3 Burevestnik … It is a rearranged P-800 from Russia. However the LRASM-B … And the Brahmos loses a larger fraction of its weight during flight than LRASM (takes a lot more energy to run at 2.8 vs .89ish). Western Navies currently favor stealthy missiles for this reason. The Chinese have one. What??? VLS seems too slow-reacting. Punching a hole in a ship doesn't do much. (A Re-post) You may have seen #Indian netizens bragging endlessly about their private corporate co-production missile Brahmos. Whether Brahmos is the deadliest or not it is a matter of debate . Both maritime and land-based variants of the system exist. A factual Comparison between India's Brahmos Missile and Pakistan's Babur and Raad Cruise Missiles. Punching a hole in a ship doesn't do much. The LRASM was intended to pioneer more sophisticated autonomous targeting capabilities than the U.S. Navy's current Harpoon anti-ship missile, which has been in service since 1977. The AGM-158C LRASM (Long Range Anti-Ship Missile) is a stealthy anti-ship cruise missile developed for the United States Air Force and United States Navy by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (). We've chosen to go more of the stealth and intelligence route with the LRASM. Instead of achieving high Mach numbers to make the missile more survivable against air defense threats, the subsonic LRASM uses stealth and autonomous decision-making to evade shipboard defenses.